Research Library

We invest in innovative meta-scientific research, as well as in the development and testing of new tools and methods to contribute to a growing body of evidence on problems and solutions in science. Our research portfolio includes work led by BITSS investigators, as well as by our partners and grantees of our Social Science Meta-Analysis and Research Transparency (SSMART) grants.

This Research Library catalogs all research projects supported or led by BITSS. All research projects are categorized by i) program, ii) metascientific topic, and iii) discipline. Filter results by applying criteria along these parameters.

Find an overview of our research portfolio here.


  • Discipline

34 Results

The growing demand for evidence-based policy has created an imperative to increase the rigor, reliability, and transparency of scientific research. The project aims to contribute significantly to the understanding of publication bias in social science research, addressing the issue of... Read More

BITSS Scholars
Fernando HocesEdward MiguelErik SørensenBertil Tungodden

While the social sciences have made impressive progress in adopting transparent research practices that facilitate verification, replication, and reuse of materials, the problem of publication bias persists. Bias on the part of peer reviewers and journal editors, as well as... Read More

BITSS Scholars
Edward MiguelDavid Laitin

A decade ago, the term "research transparency" was not on economists' radar screen, but in a few short years a scholarly movement has emerged to bring new open science practices, tools and norms into the mainstream of our discipline. The... Read More

BITSS ScholarsEconomicsEvaluations of Transparency and Reproducibility
Edward Miguel

Has there been a meaningful movement toward open science practices within the social sciences in recent years? Discussions about changes in practices such as posting data and pre-registering analyses have been marked by controversy—including over the extent to which change... Read More

BITSS ScholarsEconomicsEvaluations of Transparency and ReproducibilityInterdisciplinaryPolitical SciencePsychologySociology
Edward MiguelGarret ChristensenElizabeth Levy Paluck

The evidence-based policy movement promotes the use of empirical evidence to inform policy decision-making. While this movement has gained traction over the last two decades, several concerns about the credibility of empirical research have been identified in scientific disciplines that... Read More

BITSS ScholarsInterdisciplinaryMethods and ToolsPublic Policy
Fernando HocesSean GrantEdward Miguel

Scott Desposato and George Avelino conducted the first meta-analysis and reproducibility analysis of political science in Brazil using all articles published in the last five years in the three leading Brazilian political science and general social science journals, including the... Read More

Evaluations of Transparency and ReproducibilityMeta-Analyses and Systematic ReviewsPolitical ScienceSSMART
George AvelinoScott Desposato

The evidence-based community has championed the public registration of pre-analysis plans (PAPs) as a solution to the problem of research credibility, but without any evidence that PAPs actually bolster the credibility of research. Ofosu and Posner analyze a representative sample... Read More

EconomicsEvaluations of Transparency and ReproducibilityInterdisciplinaryMethods and ToolsPolitical ScienceSSMART
George OfosuDaniel Posner

Aggregating data across studies is a central challenge in ensuring cumulative, reproducible science. Meta-analysis is a key statistical tool for this purpose. The goal of this project is to support meta-analysis using MetaLab, an interface and central repository. MetaLab supports... Read More

Cognitive ScienceInterdisciplinaryMeta-Analyses and Systematic ReviewsPsychologySSMART
Christina BergmannSho TsujiMolly LewisMika BraginskyPage PiccininiAlejandrina CristiaMichael C. Frank

The introduction of confidence at 95 percent or 90 percent has led the academic community to accept more easily starry stories with marginally significant coefficients than starless ones with insignificant coefficients. In February 2015, the editors of eight health economics... Read More

EconomicsEvaluations of Transparency and ReproducibilitySSMART
Cristina Blanco-PerezAbel Brodeur

“Transparent and Reproducible Social Science Research: How to do open science” is the first textbook to offer a comprehensive introduction to open science tools and methods. Use code 17M6662 at checkout to take advantage of a 30% discount in purchases... Read More

BITSS ScholarsEconomicsEvaluations of Transparency and ReproducibilityMethods and ToolsPolitical SciencePsychologyScholarly Communication and Peer Review
Garret ChristensenJeremy FreeseEdward Miguel

This study estimates the effect of data sharing on the citations of academic articles, using journal policies as a natural experiment. We begin by examining 17 high-impact journals that have adopted the requirement that data from published articles be publicly... Read More

BITSS ScholarsEconomicsPolitical ScienceScholarly Communication and Peer Review
Garret ChristensenAllan DafoeEdward MiguelDon MooreAndrew K. Rose

The Guideline for Reporting Mediation Analyses (AGReMA) is an evidence- and consensus-based guideline that provides recommendations for reporting primary and secondary mediation analyses of randomized trials and observational studies. It is designed to assist authors, peer-reviewers, and journal editors to... Read More

Methods and ToolsPublic HealthSSMART
Hopin LeeJames H. McAuleySteven KamperNicolas HenschkeChristopher M. Williams

Eric-Jan Wagenmakers and colleagues developed a suite of meta-analytic techniques for Bayesian evidence synthesis, addressing a series of challenges that currently constrain classical meta-analytic procedures. These techniques include (1) an application of bridge sampling to obtain Bayes factors for random-effects... Read More

Methods and ToolsPsychologySSMART
E.J. WagenmakersRaoul GrasmanQuentin F. GronauFelix Schönbrodt

Lenz and Sahn examine how often research findings depend on suppression effects, or covariate-induced increases in effect sizes. Researchers generally scrutinize suppression effects as they want reassurance that researchers have a strong explanation for effect size increases, especially when the... Read More

Evaluations of Transparency and ReproducibilityMeta-Analyses and Systematic ReviewsPolitical ScienceSSMART
Gabriel LenzAlexander Sahn

Cleo Protogerou, Martin Hagger, and Blair Johnson developed and tested an integrated theory of the determinants of condom use among young people in Sub-Saharan Africa using meta-analytic path analysis. The meta-analysis encompassed fifty-five studies (N = 55,069), comprising 72 independent... Read More

Meta-Analyses and Systematic ReviewsPsychologySSMART
Cleo ProtogerouMartin HaggerBlair T. Johnson

This project aims to replicate and combine three recent experiments on capital transfers to poor households in two distinct phases. The first phase will produce three concise internal replications. These will be accompanied by a report detailing the challenges faced... Read More

EconomicsEvaluations of Transparency and ReproducibilityMethods and ToolsSSMART
Elliott CollinsEthan LigonReajul Chowdhury

In this study, Joshua Polanin and Mary Terzian provide an explanation of why primary study authors are unwilling to share their data and evaluate whether sending a data-sharing agreement affects participants’ willingness to share IPD. They sampled and surveyed more... Read More

Methods and ToolsPsychologyPublic HealthPublic PolicyScholarly Communication and Peer ReviewSSMART
Joshua PolaninMary Terzian

There is growing interest in research transparency and reproducibility in economics and other fields. We survey existing work on these topics within economics and discuss the evidence suggesting that publication bias, inability to replicate and specification searching remain widespread problems... Read More

BITSS ScholarsEconomicsEvaluations of Transparency and ReproducibilityMethods and Tools
Edward MiguelGarret Christensen

Protocols improve the reproducibility and accessibility of social science research. Given deficiencies in trial protocol quality, the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) Statement provides an evidence-based set of items to describe in protocols of clinical trials on... Read More

Methods and ToolsSocial ScienceSSMART
Sean Grant

Burlig, Preonas, and Woerman develop a power calculation technique and accompanying software package for experiments that use panel data. They generalize Frison and Pocock (1992) to fully arbitrary error structures, thereby extending McKenzie (2012) to allow for non-constant serial correlation.... Read More

EconomicsMethods and ToolsSSMART
Fiona BurligMatt WoermanLouis Preonas

Meta-analyses are an important tool to evaluate the literature. It is essential that meta-analyses can easily be reproduced to allow researchers to evaluate the impact of subjective choices on meta-analytic effect sizes, but also to update meta-analyses as new data... Read More

Evaluations of Transparency and ReproducibilityMeta-Analyses and Systematic ReviewsPsychologySSMART
Daniel LakensMarcel van AssenFarid AnvariKatherine CorkerJames GrangeHeike GergerFred HasselmanJacklyn KoyamaCosima LocherIan MillerElizabeth Page-GouldFelix SchönbrodtAmanda SharplesBarbara SpellmanShelly Zhou

The proposed project will utilize p-curve, a new meta-analytic tool to assess the evidentiary value of studies from social psychology and behavioral marketing. P-curves differs from meta-analytic methods by analyzing the distribution of p-values to determine the likelihood that a... Read More

Evaluations of Transparency and ReproducibilityPsychologySSMART
Leif Nelson

As methods for internal validity improve, methodological concerns have shifted toward assessing how well the research community can extrapolate from individual studies. Under recent federal granting initiatives, over $1 billion has been awarded to education programs that have been validated... Read More

EconomicsEducationEvaluations of Transparency and ReproducibilityPublic PolicySSMART
Sean Tanner

Publication bias is a substantial problem for the credibility of research in general and of meta-analyses in particular, as it yields overestimated effects and may suggest the existence of non-existing effects. Although there is consensus that publication bias exists, how... Read More

Evaluations of Transparency and ReproducibilityLife SciencesMedicineMeta-Analyses and Systematic ReviewsMetascience (Methods and Archival Science)PsychologySSMART
Robbie van AertJelte WichertsMarcel van Assen

Under-powered studies combined with low prior beliefs about intervention effects increase the chances that a positive result is overstated. We collect prior beliefs about intervention impacts from 125 experts to estimate the false positive and false negative report probabilities (FPRP... Read More

EconomicsEvaluations of Transparency and ReproducibilitySSMART
Eva VivaltAidan Coville

Publication bias leads consumers of research to observe a selected sample of statistical estimates calculated by producers of research. We calculate critical values for statistical significance that undo the distortions created by this selection effect, assuming that the only source... Read More

BITSS ScholarsMetascience (Methods and Archival Science)Methods and ToolsSocial Science
Justin McCraryGarret ChristensenDaniele Fanelli

The Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Committee met at the Center for Open Science in Charlottesville, Virginia, in November 2014 to address one important element of the incentive systems: journals' procedures and policies for publication. The committee consisted of disciplinary... Read More

BITSS ScholarsInterdisciplinaryMethods and ToolsScholarly Communication and Peer Review
Brian Nosek

There is a growing appreciation for the advantages of experimentation in the social sciences. Policy-relevant claims that in the past were backed by theoretical arguments and inconclusive correlations are now being investigated using more credible methods. Changes have been particularly... Read More

BITSS ScholarsInterdisciplinaryMethods and ToolsScholarly Communication and Peer ReviewSocial Science
Edward MiguelColin CamererKate CaseyJ. CohenKevin EsterlingAlan GerberRachel GlennersterDonald P. GreenMacartan HumphreysGuido ImbensTemina MadonLeif NelsonBrian NosekMaya PetersenRichard SedlmayrJoseph SimmonsMark van der Laan

Page 1 of 1